Respiratory motion and its compensation possibilities in the modern external beam radiotherapy of lung cancer

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a systematic review of the current characteristics and recent development of commercially available respiratory motion solutions and their compensation possibilities in the external beam radiotherapy treatment of lung cancer. The most commonly used X-ray and radiotherapeutic technologies are presented, as well as their division into pre-Treatment methods and intra-Treatment verification. The article discusses the most important technological achievements that allow radiation to be safely applied in the lung region and reports the potential advantages and limitations of each. Finally, it presents details concerning selected research trends and problems related to motion compensation.

References Powered by Scopus

Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy

337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of maximum intensity projections (MIP) for target volume generation in 4DCT scans for lung cancer

280Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Benefit of respiration-gated stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer: An analysis of 4DCT datasets

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A review of automatic lung tumour segmentation in the era of 4DCT

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

4DCT-based evaluation of lung tumor motion during the breathing cycle

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Software simulation of tumour motion dose effects during flattened and unflattened ITV-based VMAT lung SBRT

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adamczyk, M., & Piotrowski, T. (2017). Respiratory motion and its compensation possibilities in the modern external beam radiotherapy of lung cancer. Nowotwory. Via Medica. https://doi.org/10.5603/NJO.2017.0048

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

33%

Physics and Astronomy 1

33%

Engineering 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free