Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review

109Citations
Citations of this article
141Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism remains a common and potentially life-threatening disease. For patients with intermediate-and high-risk pulmonary embolism, catheter-based revascularization therapy has emerged as potential alternative to systemic thrombolysis or surgical embolectomy. Ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis is a contemporary catheter-based technique and is the focus of the present review. Ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis is more effective in reversing right ventricular dysfunction and dilatation in comparison with anticoagulation alone in patients at intermediate risk. However, a direct comparison of ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis with systemic thrombolysis or surgical thrombectomy is not available. Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis with initial intrapulmonary thrombolytic bolus may also be effective in high-risk patients, but evidence from randomized trials is not available. This review summarizes current data on ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism. © 2014 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Engelberger, R. P., & Kucher, N. (2014). Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review. European Heart Journal. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free