Technological variability of the middle-to-upper paleolithic transition: Examples from the Balkans and neighbouring regions

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter attempts to track the technological variability, innovations, and changes in lithic technologies that occurred in several regions of the Balkans and its neighbouring areas during the late Middle and Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP). A diversity of knapping methods and techniques has been recorded by analysing debitage, reduction sequences, and refitting data of selected key assemblages. The Middle Paleolithic (MP) technological structure appears to include a series of independent methods of blank production: Levallois, non-Levallois, and the volumetric laminar production. Similarly, the EUP technological structure also follows several models: (a) exclusive/dominant Upper Paleolithic (UP) laminar strategies; (b) a combination of UP strategies with different MP technologies; and (c) a fusion in one reduction sequence of volumetric blade and “flat” Levallois point concepts. Originally identified by refitting, the latter innovative model is central to understanding the marked technological transition and the emergence of the UP technological package.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sitlivy, V. (2016). Technological variability of the middle-to-upper paleolithic transition: Examples from the Balkans and neighbouring regions. In Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology (pp. 229–265). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0874-4_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free