OPPCAT: Ontology population from tabular data

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order to present large amount of information on the Web to both users and machines, it is urgently needed to structure Web data. E-commerce is one of the areas where increasing data bottlenecks on the Web inhibit data access. Ontological display of the product information enables better product comparison and search applications using the semantics of the product specifications and their corresponding values. In this article, we present a framework called OPPCAT, which is used for semi-automatic ontology population from tabular data in e-commerce stores and product catalogues. As a result, OPPCAT allows tabular data to be used for mass production of ontology content. First, we present the common patterns in tabular data which obstruct semi-automatic production of ontologies. Then, we suggest solutions which automatically fix these errors. Finally, we define an algorithm to build ontology content semi-automatically.

References Powered by Scopus

An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale

3302Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use

1712Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The knowledge model of protégé-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility

379Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A method of semi-automated ontology population from multiple semi-structured data sources

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Semantics of COVID-19 Web Data: Ontology Learning and Population

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anomalies resolution and semantification of tabular data

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ozturk, O. (2020). OPPCAT: Ontology population from tabular data. Journal of Information Science, 46(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519827892

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Researcher 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

83%

Design 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free