Four-dimensional Reality and Determinism; an Answer to Stein

  • Rietdijk W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

1. We argue that the constancy of c implies a realistic now at a distance in all inertial systems, which in turn leads to determinism.2. We elaborate that denying this violates physical consistency, that requires the concept “velocity”.3. Physics implies models making the world observationally and logically coherent, also as to the experiences of different observers. Velocity and now at a distance are cases in point.4. Retroaction – which implies a realistic future – can be demonstrated to appear in some experiments.5. We give a demonstration of determinism via reality at a distance that has an effect here and now too.6. If the phenomenon of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) does not imply retroaction, it makes necessary nonlocal signals. This is highly relevant to reality and “now” at a distance.7. The clock paradox shows concrete visible consequences of “merely metrical” relativistic coordination and time flow at a distance.Keywords: determinism, special relativity, indeterminism, clock paradox, block universe

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rietdijk, W. (2007). Four-dimensional Reality and Determinism; an Answer to Stein. In Relativity and the Dimensionality of the World (pp. 101–113). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6318-3_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free