AUCTION–LOTTERY HYBRID MECHANISMS: STRUCTURAL MODEL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article studies an auction–lottery hybrid mechanism that is widely adopted in allocating new vehicle licenses in China. We characterize individuals' entry and bidding strategies in a symmetric Bayesian Nash equilibrium, structurally estimate individuals' value distribution from a data set of a Guangzhou program, and evaluate the performance of the mechanism. Based on the estimated distribution and counterfactual analysis, our study suggests that a hybrid mechanism preserves 83% efficiency and 52% of revenue, while it improves equity by 25 times compared to a pure auction. We show that allowing auction losers to participate in the lottery can further enhance the performance.

References Powered by Scopus

Optimal nonparametric estimation of first-price auctions

365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Auctions with a stochastic number of bidders

180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Competitive bidding with entry costs

174Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Income distribution, implementation sequence, and equity in auto ownership rationing

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gasoline and electric vehicle ownership rationing over time: Lottery vs. First-come-first-served schemes

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Born to Wait? A Study on Allocation Rules in Booking Systems

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, Y., & Wen, Q. (2019). AUCTION–LOTTERY HYBRID MECHANISMS: STRUCTURAL MODEL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS. International Economic Review, 60(1), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12356

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12

92%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free