Quantitative caveats of standard immunohistochemical procedures: Implications for optical disector-based designs

15Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry is a ubiquitous technique in histology. Often, the goal of such studies is the quantification of some parameter associated with a particular antigen. When used correctly, the optical disector offers a statistically relevant approach to achieve this goal without bias from cell size, shape, or orientation. This three-dimensional counting probe is virtually embedded within the depth of the tissue section, thus avoiding sampling near the cut surfaces of the section, where cells are often lost during the cutting and subsequent processing steps. It follows that the probability that a cell could be immunolabeled should be equal throughout the section depth to correctly employ the optical disector. In this report, we demonstrate that parameters commonly used in immunohistochemistry often leave the middle of the section unlabeled. Furthermore, the degree of incomplete penetration varies among antibodies but can be overcome in some cases by extending the incubation time of the secondary antibody. The detection of this phenomenon in immunofluorescence preparations and the implications of these findings for quantitative stereology using the optical disector are discussed. © 2010 Melvin and Sutherland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Melvin, N. R., & Sutherland, R. J. (2010). Quantitative caveats of standard immunohistochemical procedures: Implications for optical disector-based designs. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 58(7), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.1369/jhc.2009.954164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free