The relationship between implementation of school-wide positive behavior intervention and supports and performance on state accountability measures

3Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study examined data from 96 schools in a Southeastern U.S. state participating in training and/or coaching on School- Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) provided by the State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) in their state. Schools studied either received training only (“non-intensive” sites) or training and on-site coaching (“intensive” sites). Fidelity of implementation was self-evaluated by both types of schools using the Benchmarks of Quality (BOQ). Some schools were also externally evaluated using the School-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET), with those scoring 80% or higher determined “model sites.” Using an independent sample t-test, analyses revealed statistically significant differences between intensive and nonintensive schools’ Quality of Distribution Index (QDI) scores and between model sites and nonmodel sites on QDI scores. Correlations were performed to determine whether the fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS as measured by the BOQ was related to any of the state’s accountability measures: performance classification, QDI, or growth.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marin, A. M., & Filce, H. G. (2013). The relationship between implementation of school-wide positive behavior intervention and supports and performance on state accountability measures. SAGE Open, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503831

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free