There has been a lack of recourse to the language of 'The Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) in respect of reports that the Chinese government is perpetrating mass atrocity crimes against the Muslim minorities that reside in Xinjiang. What does this suggest about the overall normative power of R2P, and is the neglect of R2P reflective of a more general weakening in provisions designed to deal with wide-scale human rights abuses?
CITATION STYLE
Foot, R. (2021). R2P sidelined: The international response to China’s repression of Muslim minorities in Xinjiang. Global Responsibility to Protect. Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-984X-13010005
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.