R2P sidelined: The international response to China's repression of Muslim minorities in Xinjiang

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There has been a lack of recourse to the language of 'The Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) in respect of reports that the Chinese government is perpetrating mass atrocity crimes against the Muslim minorities that reside in Xinjiang. What does this suggest about the overall normative power of R2P, and is the neglect of R2P reflective of a more general weakening in provisions designed to deal with wide-scale human rights abuses?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foot, R. (2021). R2P sidelined: The international response to China’s repression of Muslim minorities in Xinjiang. Global Responsibility to Protect. Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-984X-13010005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free