Community engagement to pilot electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROs) in early intervention: Lessons learned

  • Rigau B
  • Scully E
  • Dooling-Litfin J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Electronic data capture is essential to advancing family-centered coordinated care in early intervention (EI). The purpose of this paper is to report on EI service coordinator response to piloting an electronic parent-reported outcome (e-PRO) assessment as part of their routine workflow, including lessons learned that may inform future phases of e-PRO implementation. METHODS This second pilot study involved families enrolled in a large EI program (n=1040 families) in concert with their implementation of a statewide quality improvement initiative for care plan development and outcomes reporting. A total of 22 EI service coordinators and supervisors were engaged in three phases: initial e-PRO intervention, peer mentor enhancement, and standard recruitment protocol. RESULTS Implementation of the e-PRO intervention and peer mentoring enhancement yielded low enrollment rates over the first six months (n=17). A standard recruitment protocol has resulted in enrollment growth (n=83) towards the targeted enrollment rate (n=832). CONCLUSIONS This study reports on early insights for building and sustaining a productive academic-community partnership for e-PRO implementation to support family-centered coordinated care. Lessons learned from this academic-community partnership with respect to strategies for enhancing community significance, collaboration, return, and control are discussed as they inform further development of this intervention prior to scale-up.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rigau, B. L., Scully, E. A., Dooling-Litfin, J. K., Murphy, N. J., McManus, B. M., & Khetani, M. A. (2018). Community engagement to pilot electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROs) in early intervention: Lessons learned. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 2(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free