Pearce element ratio diagrams and cumulate rocks

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While this chapter is about Pearce element ratios, I've included some personal reflections as this book is a 50th Anniversary project of the IAMG. Pearce element ratios, Felix Chayes and the Chayes medal, came together on September 11, 2001. As the recipient of the Chayes Medal, I was in Cancún, Mexico on that fateful date to deliver a talk on Pearce element ratios. Pearce element ratios are designed to model processes of fractionation and accumulation in igneous systems. They are frequently used to extract information from analyses of rocks formed from melts produced by fractionation-volcanic suites. Rock bodies formed from the fractionated crystals-the cumulate rocks-have received practically no attention. From the standard paradigm describing the formation of cumulate rocks, based on studies of the Skaergaard Intrusion, one expects a predicted pattern of data points on a Pearce element ratio diagram. Points derived from the mean compositions of the units in the cumulate body should fall up-slope from the point representing the initial melt composition on a diagram that accounts for the cumulate assemblage. Points derived from the compositions of the inferred residual melts present at the beginning of crystallization of a unit in the rock body should fall down-slope from the point representing the initial magma. The distance between a point on the line of a Pearce element ratio diagram and the point representing the initial magma composition depends on (1) the size of the aliquot that crystallized to form the rock unit and (2) the ratio of crystals to melt in the mush that solidified to form the rock unit. Patterns extracted from computer simulations compared to analogous data points from units of the Skaergaard Intrusion indicate that the crystal mushes that formed the units of the Marginal Border Series had a smaller ratio of trapped melt to crystals than did coeval mushes forming the Upper Border Series. Simulation patterns further indicate that the LZa and UZa units of the Layered Series formed from assemblages with larger ratios of melt to crystals than did the respective coeval units, LZa* and UZa*, of the Marginal Border Series.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicholls, J. (2018). Pearce element ratio diagrams and cumulate rocks. In Handbook of Mathematical Geosciences: Fifty Years of IAMG (pp. 875–896). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78999-6_43

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free