The Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) has increased the amount of data collected before and after donation and increased the duration of donor follow-up to 2 years, yet there is evidence that reporting is incomplete. We examined the frequency of missing data in the OPTN/UNOS donor follow-up registry and found that reporting rates were low, particularly for donors who may have limited access to health care. We argue that a national donor follow-up registry is essential to ensure transparency in ascertaining long-term health outcomes among all living donors and in providing assessments of quality assurance within transplant programs. We have suggested approaches to strengthen the donor follow-up registry system. These include setting clear and high standards for follow-up reporting, a system of incentives and penalties that would motivate transplant centers to comply with these standards and would encourage donors to follow-up and lifelong follow-up reporting by primary care providers. We argue that the US government must provide funding to support a donor follow-up registry that can allow for meaningful and valid conclusions, in recognition of donors' public service and to maintain trust in the system of living organ donation. © Copyright 2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Ommen, E. S., LaPointe Rudow, D., Medapalli, R. K., Schröppel, B., & Murphy, B. (2011, December). When good intentions are not enough: Obtaining follow-up data in living kidney donors. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03815.x