Duoethnography as a pedagogical tool that encourages deep reflection

8Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter explores our use of duoethnography as a pedagogical tool in preservice teacher education classes. It encourages teacher candidates to deeply reflect on any underlying prejudices they may hold that could impact their teaching and learning practice. To unearth their biases and assumptions, Hilary focused on the concept of diversity in a foundational methods course while Joe focused on mental health in a Health and Physical Education (HPE) course. Both authors share nodal moments from their teaching contexts and the challenges they faced. Our analysis suggests that guiding teacher candidates toward higher-order levels of reflection such as critical and self-reflection creates a disequilibrium for both the teacher candidate and the instructor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, H., & Barrett, J. (2016). Duoethnography as a pedagogical tool that encourages deep reflection. In Theorizing Curriculum Studies, Teacher Education, and Research through Duoethnographic Pedagogy (pp. 85–110). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51745-6_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free