Abstract
With the recent upsurge in interest in agents for 'serious games,' there has been a focus on the 'believability' of agents in these settings. In this paper, I argue that when evaluating agents in this context, believability is often in fact of relatively minor importance, and indeed that focusing on this criteria can detract from the ultimate goals of the games. I present this argument in the context of a project for which the aim was to extend the BDI agent framework to better support human modelling in serious games. © 2009 Springer-Verlag.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Norling, E. (2009). On evaluating agents for serious games. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5920 LNAI, pp. 155–169). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11198-3_11
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
