Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: Analysis from five countries

14Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Studies have reported on the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs), but little is known about their impact on health care costs and resource use. Methods: Health care providers and payers in five countries were recruited for an online survey by independent administrators to ensure that investigators and respondents were blinded to each other. Surveys were conducted in the local language and began with a “screener” to ensure that respondents had relevant expertise and experience. Responses were analyzed using Excel and R, with the Dixon’s Q statistic used to identify and remove outliers. Global and country-specific average treatment patterns were calculated via bootstrapping; costs were mean values. The sum product of costs and intervention probability gave a cost per AE. Results: Responses were received from 101 providers and 26 payers, the majority having 5 years of experience. At a minimum, the respondents performed a total of 3,430 procedural sedations per month. All AEs detailed occurred in clinical practice in the last year and were reported to cause procedural delays and cancellations in some patients. Standard procedural sedation costs ranged from €74 (Germany) to $2,300 (US). Respondents estimated that AEs would increase costs by between 16% (Italy) and 179% (US). Hypotension was reported as the most commonly observed AE with an associated global mean cost (interquartile range) of $43 ($27-$68). Other frequent AEs, including mild hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, mild oxygen desaturation, hypertension, and brief apnea, were estimated to increase health care spending on procedural sedation by $2.2 billion annually in the US. Conclusion: All sedation-related AEs can increase health care costs and result in substantial delays or cancellations of subsequent procedures. The prevention of even minor AEs during procedural sedation may be crucial to ensuring its value as a health care service.

References Powered by Scopus

Microstream capnography improves patient monitoring during moderate sedation: A randomized, controlled trial

243Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Capnographic Monitoring of Respiratory Activity Improves Safety of Sedation for Endoscopic Cholangiopancreatography and Ultrasonography

195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adverse event reporting tool to standardize the reporting and tracking of adverse events during procedural sedation: A consensus document from the World SIVA International Sedation Task Force

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparing a virtual reality-based simulation app (VR-MRI) with a standard preparatory manual and child life program for improving success and reducing anxiety during pediatric medical imaging: Randomized clinical trial

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Antihistamine effects and safety of fexofenadine: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association between propofol dose and 1-year mortality in patients with or without a diagnosis of solid cancer

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saunders, R., Davis, J. A., Kranke, P., Weissbrod, R., Whitaker, D. K., & Lightdale, J. R. (2018). Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: Analysis from five countries. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 14, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S154720

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

50%

Researcher 5

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

15%

Engineering 3

11%

Psychology 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0