How does descending aorta geometry change when it dissects?

56Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is the treatment of choice in complicated acute type B aortic dissection. How to infer predissection aortic diameter is not well understood. Our aim was to delineate changes in descending aortic geometry due to dissection. METHODS: Five tertiary centres reviewed their acute aortic dissection type B databases containing 802 patients. All patients who had undergone computed tomography angiography less than 2 years before and immediately after aortic dissection onset were included. We compared the aortic geometry before and after the dissection onset. RESULTS: Altogether 25 patients were included [median age 60 (first quartile 52, third quartile 72) years; 60% men]. In all except 1 patient, the maximum descending aortic diameter was less than 45mm before aortic dissection onset. The largest increase in diameter induced by the dissection was observed in the proximal descending aorta 28.2 (25.1, 32.1) vs 34.6 (31.3, 39.1)mm (+6.4 mm; +23%; P < 0.001). The thoracic descending aortic length increased after the dissection onset [253.3 (229.3, 271.9) vs 261.3 (247.9, 285.4) mm; P = 0.003]. The predissection aortic diameter of the proximal thoracic descending aorta was 7.9 (5.2, 10.7)mm larger (P < 0.001) than the post-dissection area-derived true-lumen diameter and 2.5 (1.3, 6.1)mm larger than the maximum true-lumen diameter (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Type B aortic dissection increases the diameter, length and volume of the descending thoracic aorta. The predissection aortic diameter most closely resembles the post-dissection maximum diameter of the true lumen.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rylski, B., Muñoz, C., Beyersdorf, F., Siepe, M., Reser, D., Carrel, T., … Czerny, M. (2018). How does descending aorta geometry change when it dissects? European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 53(4), 815–821. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx292

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free