Comparison of the cumulative efficacy and safety of chloroquine, artesunate, and chloroquine-primaquine in plasmodium vivax malaria

52Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Chloroquine has been recommended for Plasmodium vivax infections for >60 years, but resistance is increasing. To guide future therapies, the cumulative benefits of using slowly eliminated (chloroquine) vs rapidly eliminated (artesunate) antimalarials, and the risks and benefits of adding radical cure (primaquine) were assessed in a 3-way randomized comparison conducted on the Thailand-Myanmar border. Methods Patients with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria were given artesunate (2 mg/kg/day for 5 days), chloroquine (25 mg base/kg over 3 days), or chloroquine-primaquine (0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days) and were followed for 1 year. Recurrence rates and their effects on anemia were compared. Results Between May 2010 and October 2012, 644 patients were enrolled. Artesunate cleared parasitemia significantly faster than chloroquine. Day 28 recurrence rates were 50% with artesunate (112/224), 8% with chloroquine (18/222; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chu, C. S., Phyo, A. P., Lwin, K. M., Win, H. H., San, T., Aung, A. A., … White, N. J. (2018). Comparison of the cumulative efficacy and safety of chloroquine, artesunate, and chloroquine-primaquine in plasmodium vivax malaria. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 67(10), 1543–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free