Open Pyeloplasty in Infants under 1 Year—Proven or Meaningless?

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children has significantly increased. Nowadays, open pyeloplasty (OP) seems to lose importance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OP in infants < 1 year. Medical records of patients < 1 year with UPJO who had undergone retroperitoneal OP (January 2008–February 2022) at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Included patients were operated on according to a modified Anderson–Hynes technique. All clinical, operative, and postoperative (1 month–5 years’ follow-up) data were collected. Additionally, a nonvalidated questionnaire was sent to the patients/parents. A total of 162 infants (124 boys) met the inclusion criteria. The median age at surgery was 3 months (range: 0–11 months). The median operation time was 106 min (range: 63–198 min). None of the patients had severe surgical complication (Clavien–Dindo > 3). The nonvalidated questionnaire showed a high impact of quality of life. Follow-up was in median 30.5 months (0–162 months). OP is still a reliable procedure with good long-term results especially in infants < 1 year of age, which can be performed in a variety of centers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vauth, F., Zöhrer, P., Girtner, F., Rösch, W. H., & Hofmann, A. (2023). Open Pyeloplasty in Infants under 1 Year—Proven or Meaningless? Children, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020257

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free