Retransmission and congestion control of hop-by-hop protocols and end-to-end protocols in wireless sensor networks

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks serene of number of nodes, which monitors the environment. Monitored data is send to the base station by a sensor node. Information may be lost at the sender side or in intermediate node itself. This lost information can be rectified by number of protocols. Generally loss recovery is done by hop-by-hop and end-to-end in WSN. This paper analyses and compares shop-by-hop protocol and end-to-end in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). We examine and compared hop-by-hop and end-to-end protocols based on some constraints such as retransmission and reliability. We classify the transport protocols into two groups such as hop-by-hop and end-to-end. Hop-by-hop protocol and end-to-end protocols are compared based on the parameter such as retransmission and congestion control, time delay and energy efficiency. We finalized that hop-by-hop protocols are best suited for retransmission and time delay; end to end protocols are suited for congestion control and energy efficiency.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geetha Mageswari, P., Jayakarthik, R., & Nidhya, M. S. (2019). Retransmission and congestion control of hop-by-hop protocols and end-to-end protocols in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6), 1906–1910. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.F7918.088619

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free