Ventilator-induced lung injury: From the bench to the bedside

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Once upon a time the existence of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) was debated. After all, most patients with lung dysfunction requiring mechanical ventilation had other potential causes of lung injury, and many patients appeared to tolerate mechanical ventilation for prolonged periods without any adverse sequelae. However, as a result of numerous studies over the past century, and especially during the past 20 years it is now generally accepted that mechanical ventilation per se can initiate as well as exacerbate lung injury and contribute to patient morbidity and mortality. This review examines the seminal bench and bedside studies that contributed to our current understanding of VILI, and that form the basis for current recommendations for mechanical ventilation of the critically ill. Figure 1 schematically depicts a timeline of bench to bedside research on VILI. Included in this review are many of the most frequently cited studies (with the number of citations, N, from the Institute for Science Information Citation Index as of August 2005 included in parentheses), as well as those studies which the authors feel have had a particularly significant impact on subsequent research and/or clinical practice. © 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tremblay, L. N., & Slutsky, A. S. (2006). Ventilator-induced lung injury: From the bench to the bedside. In Applied Physiology in Intensive Care Medicine (pp. 357–366). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37363-2_50

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free