Intake of meat proteins substantially increased the relative abundance of genus Lactobacillus in rat feces

42Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Diet has been shown to have a critical influence on gut bacteria and host health, and high levels of red meat in diet have been shown to increase colonic DNA damage and thus be harmful to gut health. However, previous studies focused more on the effects of meat than of meat proteins. In order to investigate whether intake of meat proteins affects the composition and metabolic activities of gut microbiota, feces were collected from growing rats that were fed with either meat proteins (from beef, pork or fish) or non-meat proteins (casein or soy) for 14 days. The resulting composition of gut microbiota was profiled by sequencing the V4-V5 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA genes and the short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed using gas chromatography. The composition of gut microbiota and SCFA levels were significantly different between the five diet groups. At a recommended dose of 20% protein in the diet, meat protein-fed rats had a higher relative abundance of the beneficial genus Lactobacillus, but lower levels of SCFAs and SCFA-producing bacteria including Fusobacterium, Bacteroides and Prevotella, compared with the soy protein-fed group. Further work is needed on the regulatory pathways linking dietary protein intake to gut microbiota.

Figures

  • Table 1. The composition of five formulated diets.
  • Fig 1. Relative abundance of gut bacteria at the phylum level. Pie charts show the composition of gut bacteria at the phylum level. Bray-Curtis similarity cluster analysis shows that the composition of gut bacteria in feces from the beef, pork and fish protein-fed groups could be separated from those of the casein and soy protein-fed groups.
  • Fig 2. Relative abundance of gut bacteria in rat feces at the family and genus levels. a) At the family level. b) At the genus level.
  • Fig 3. Relative abundance ofBacteroides and Lactobacillus in different diet groups. The mean and median relative abundances are indicated with solid and dashed lines respectively. Each column represents one biological sample and there are 49 biological samples in total, including 11 from the casein group, 11 from the soy protein group, 8 from the beef protein group, 9 from the pork protein group and 10 from the fish protein group. The samples were classified into "non-meat" (casein and soy protein) and "meat" (beef, pork and fish proteins).
  • Fig 4. Differences in bacterial communities at the OTU level. The figure includes three parts: 1) The right panel shows the relative abundance (log 10 transformation) of OTUs. Each column represents one biological sample and each row represents one OTU; 2) the middle panel shows the fold-changes of OTUs that changed significantly (p < 0.05) compared to the casein group. Red denotes an increase, blue denotes a decrease. S, soy protein group; B, beef protein group; P, pork protein group; F, fish protein group; 3) the left panel lists significantly changed OTUs and the corresponding phyla, families and genera.
  • Table 2. Effect of the type of dietary protein on SCFA levels (μmol/g, means ± standard deviations).
  • Table 3. Effect of the type of dietary protein on growth performance and food intake of rats.

References Powered by Scopus

AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: Final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet

7329Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage

5091Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine

4271Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Contributions of the interaction between dietary protein and gut microbiota to intestinal health

204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the gut microbiome, and diet

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of diet and gut environment on the gastrointestinal formation of N-nitroso compounds: A review

95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, Y., Lin, X., Li, H., Li, Y., Shi, X., Zhao, F., … Zhou, G. (2016). Intake of meat proteins substantially increased the relative abundance of genus Lactobacillus in rat feces. PLoS ONE, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152678

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

55%

Researcher 11

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26

59%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 12

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

9%

Chemistry 2

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 303

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0