Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty

234Citations
Citations of this article
169Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and purpose The risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be increasing in Norway. We investigated whether this increase is a common feature in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden). Materials and methods The study was based on the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) dataset. 432,168 primary THAs from 1995 to 2009 were included (Denmark: 83,853, Finland 78,106, Norway 88,455, and Sweden 181,754). Adjusted survival analyses were performed using Cox regression models with revision due to infection as the endpoint. The effect of risk factors such as the year of surgery, age, sex, diagnosis, type of prosthesis, and fixation were assessed. Results 2,778 (0.6%) of the primary THAs were revised due to infection. Compared to the period 19951999, the relative risk (with 95% CI) of revision due to infection was 1.1 (1.01.2) in 20002004 and 1.6 (1.41.7) in 20052009. Adjusted cumulative 5year revision rates due to infection were 0.46% (0.420.50) in 19951999, 0.54% (0.500.58) in 20002004, and 0.71% (0.660.76) in 20052009. The entire increase in risk of revision due to infection was within 1 year of primary surgery, and most notably in the first 3 months. The risk of revision due to infection increased in all 4 countries. Risk factors for revision due to infection were male sex, hybrid fixation, cement without antibiotics, and THA performed due to inflammatory disease, hip fracture, or femoral head necrosis. None of these risk factors increased in incidence during the study period. Interpretation We found increased relative risk of revision and increased cumulative 5year revision rates due to infection after primary THA during the period 19952009. No change in risk factors in the NARA dataset could explain this increase. We believe that there has been an actual increase in the incidence of prosthetic joint infections after THA. © Copyright: ©Nordic Orthopaedic Federation.

References Powered by Scopus

National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2·7 million participants

2918Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: From the workgroup of the musculoskeletal infection society

1565Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Periprosthetic joint infection: The incidence, timing, and predisposing factors

1118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Prosthetic joint infection

1363Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Antibacterial surface treatment for orthopaedic implants

288Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology

246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dale, H., Fenstad, A. M., Hallan, G., Havelin, L. I., Furnes, O., Overgaard, S., … Engesæter, L. B. (2012). Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica, 83(5), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.733918

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 60

57%

Researcher 29

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 82

84%

Engineering 6

6%

Materials Science 5

5%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 5

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free