Chronic Pravastatin but Not Atorvastatin Treatment Impairs Cognitive Function in Two Rodent Models of Learning and Memory

45Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Statins are some of the most commonly prescribed drugs and are used to reduce blood cholesterol. Recent evidence suggests that, in some patients, they may adversely influence cognitive function including causing memory impairments. These clinical observations have led to statin prescriptions now including a warning about possible cognitive impairments. In order to better understand the relationship between statin treatment and cognitive function, studies in animals are needed. The present study investigated the effects of chronic treatment with two statins, pravastatin and atorvastatin, in two rodent models of learning and memory. Adult rats were treated once daily with pravastatin (10mg/kg, orally) or atorvostatin (10mg/kg, orally) for 18 days. Before, during and after treatment, animals were tested in a simple discrimination and reversal learning task. On the last day of treatment and following one week withdrawal, animals were also tested in a task of novel object discrimination. Pravastatin tended to impair learning over the last few days of treatment and this effect was fully reversed once treatment ceased. In the novel object discrimination task, pravastatin significantly impaired object recognition memory. No effects were observed for atorvostatin in either task. These data suggest that chronic treatment with pravastatin impairs working and recognition memory in rodents. The reversibility of the effects on cessation of treatment is similar to what has been observed in patients, but the lack of effect of atorvostatin suggests that lipophilicity may not be a major factor influencing statin-induced cognitive impairments. © 2013 Stuart et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Timeline illustrating the study design. Animals received once daily treatment with statin or vehicle orally between 4 and 5 pm for a total of 18 days. Simple discrimination and reversal learning was tested the day before drug treatment commenced (-1), during treatment on days 0, 1, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 15, and 18, and post-treatment on days 23 and 25. Novel object discrimination tests were carried out during treatment on day 18 and post-treatment on day 28.
  • Figure 2. Effects of chronic treatment with statins on body weight in normal rats. Body weight was recorded at the end of the study. There was no significant difference in group body weight suggesting treatments did not adversely affect the animals’ overall health. Data shown as mean body weight ± s.e.m.
  • Figure 3. Effect of chronic statin treatment (10mg/kg p.o.) on learning in simple discrimination (A) and reversal learning tasks (B) in normal rats. All treatment groups demonstrated a significant learning effect in both tasks, showing a significant decrease in trials to criteria across the study period. There was no significant main effect of statin treatment across the study period compared to vehicle-treated animals. Data shown as mean trials to criteria ± s.e.m., n = 8 animals per group. Period of drug treatment is denoted by horizontal line.
  • Table 1. Summary of the results from the simple discrimination and reversal learning experiment before, during and after chronic administration of control, pravastain or atorvostatin (one x daily for 18 days).
  • Figure 4. Effect of chronic statin treatment (10mg/kg p.o.) on trial latency in simple discrimination (A) and reversal tasks (B) in normal rats. All treatment groups demonstrated a significant decrease in response latency as the study progressed but there was no significant effect of statin treatment on response latency before, during or after treatment compared to vehicle-treated animals. Data shown as mean latency ± s.e.m. Period of drug treatment is denoted by horizontal line.
  • Figure 5. Effect of chronic statin treatment (10mg/kg p.o.) on learning in a simple discrimination (A) and reversal task (B) on the final day of treatment. On the final day of treatment, pravastatin significantly impaired learning ability in the simple discrimination task as reflected by an increase in trials to criteria compared to controls (**p<0.01; n=8/group). There was a trend towards an impairment in reversal learning following pravastatin treatment (p=0.09; n=8/group). Atorvastatin had no effect on learning in either task. Data shown as mean trials to criteria ± s.e.m.
  • Figure 6. Effect of chronic statin treatment (10mg/kg p.o.) and withdrawal on exploration in a novel object discrimination (NOD) task in normal rats. Pravastatin, but not atorvastatin significantly impaired the animals’ ability to discriminate the novel from the familiar object after 18 days of treatment. Following 10 days withdrawal from treatment, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Data shown as mean D ratio ± sem, **p<0.01 vs. vehicle; n = 7-8/group (1 animal excluded from pravastatin group).
  • Table 2. Summary of the results from the novel object discrimination task at the end of treatment with control, pravastain or atorvostatin and following 10 days withdrawal from treatment.

References Powered by Scopus

Animal research: Reporting in vivo experiments: The ARRIVE guidelines

3198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): A randomised controlled trial

3175Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data

2732Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Models and mechanisms of vascular dementia

260Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Do Statins Impair Cognition? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

White matter damage and glymphatic dysfunction in a model of vascular dementia in rats with no prior vascular pathologies

105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stuart, S. A., Robertson, J. D., Marrion, N. V., & Robinson, E. S. J. (2013). Chronic Pravastatin but Not Atorvastatin Treatment Impairs Cognitive Function in Two Rodent Models of Learning and Memory. PLoS ONE, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075467

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

75%

Researcher 4

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

38%

Neuroscience 5

24%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

24%

Psychology 3

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 18

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0