Balancing accountability and privacy in the network

9Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Though most would agree that accountability and privacy are both valuable, today's Internet provides little support for either. Previous efforts have explored ways to offer stronger guarantees for one of the two, typically at the expense of the other; indeed, at first glance accountability and privacy appear mutually exclusive. At the center of the tussle is the source address: in an accountable Internet, source ad- dresses undeniably link packets and senders so hosts can be punished for bad behavior. In a privacy-preserving Internet, source addresses are hidden as much as possible. In this paper, we argue that a balance is possible. We introduce the Accountable and Private Internet Protocol (APIP), which splits source addresses into two separate fields | an accountability address and a return address | and in- Troduces independent mechanisms for managing each. Ac- countability addresses, rather than pointing to hosts, point to accountability delegates, which agree to vouch for packets on their clients' behalves, taking appropriate action when misbehavior is reported. With accountability handled by delegates, senders are now free to mask their return ad- dresses; we discuss a few techniques for doing so.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naylor, D., Mukerjee, M. K., & Steenkiste, P. (2015). Balancing accountability and privacy in the network. In Computer Communication Review (Vol. 44, pp. 75–86). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2619239.2626306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free