Science, reasons and normativity

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Science is often seen as empirical inquiry that aims at proof or explanation, but eschews normative considerations. This, I shall argue, is inadequate. Scientific thinking and practice also depend on additional standards, including a range of norms that are not and cannot be established by empirical methods. It follows that science cannot and should not aspire to be value free. © 2013 Academia Europæa.

References Powered by Scopus

Science in a democratic society

293Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Rights-based practice and marginalized children in child protection work

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Neill, O. (2013). Science, reasons and normativity. European Review, 21(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798713000197

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘19‘21‘2200.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

38%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 6

86%

Environmental Science 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0