Explicit and implicit evaluation of physician adherence to hypertension guidelines.

61Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study evaluated physician adherence to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) hypertension guidelines in 6 community-based clinics. Explicit review of retrospective medical record data for patients with uncontrolled hypertension measured guideline adherence using 22 criteria. Mean overall guideline adherence was 53.5% and did not improve significantly over time. Random-effects models demonstrated significant associations between guideline adherence and various demographic and medical predictors, including age, minority status, comorbid conditions, and number of medications. A subsequent implicit review evaluated the degree to which nonadherence was justifiable and identified factors that might have affected adherence. Nonadherence was rated as justifiable for only 6.6% of the failed explicit criteria. In general, adherence to the JNC 7 guidelines was modest even when barriers that might have affected adherence were taken into consideration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ardery, G., Carter, B. L., Milchak, J. L., Bergus, G. R., Dawson, J. D., James, P. A., … Kim, Y. (2007). Explicit and implicit evaluation of physician adherence to hypertension guidelines. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 9(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06112.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free