Augmented reality guidance for needle biopsies: A randomized, controlled trial in Phantoms

39Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We report the results of a randomized, controlled trial to compare the accuracy of standard ultrasound-guided needle biopsy to biopsies performed using a 3D Augmented Reality (AR) guidance system. Fifty core biopsies of breast phantoms were conducted by a board-certified radiologist, with each set of five biopsies randomly assigned to one of the methods. The raw ultrasound data from each biopsy was recorded. Another board-certified radiologist, blinded to the actual biopsy guidance mechanism, evaluated the ultrasound recordings and determined the distance of the biopsy from the ideal position. A repeated measures analysis of variance indicated that the head-mounted display method led to a statistically significantly smaller mean deviation from the desired target than did the CRT display method. (2.48mm for control versus 1.62mm for augmented reality, p < 0.02). This result suggests that AR systems can offer improved accuracy over traditional biopsy guidance methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosenthal, M., State, A., Lee, J., Hirota, G., Ackerman, J., Keller, K., … Fuchs, H. (2001). Augmented reality guidance for needle biopsies: A randomized, controlled trial in Phantoms. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2208, pp. 240–248). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45468-3_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free