Clinical metagenomics assessments improve diagnosis and outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia

23Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Identifying the causes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is challenging due to the disease’s complex etiology and the limitations of traditional microbiological diagnostic methods. Recent advances in next generation sequencing (NGS)-based metagenomics allow pan-pathogen detection in a single assay, and may have significant advantages over culture-based techniques. Results: We conducted a cohort study of 159 CAP patients to assess the diagnostic performance of a clinical metagenomics assay and its impact on clinical management and patient outcomes. When compared to other techniques, clinical metagenomics detected more pathogens in more CAP cases, and identified a substantial number of polymicrobial infections. Moreover, metagenomics results led to changes in or confirmation of clinical management in 35 of 59 cases; these 35 cases also had significantly improved patient outcomes. Conclusions: Clinical metagenomics could be a valuable tool for the diagnosis and treatment of CAP. Trial registration: Trial registration number with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100043628.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xie, F., Duan, Z., Zeng, W., Xie, S., Xie, M., Fu, H., … Xie, L. (2021). Clinical metagenomics assessments improve diagnosis and outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia. BMC Infectious Diseases, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06039-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free