Interventions to increase seasonal influenza vaccine coverage in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

102Citations
Citations of this article
173Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Influenza vaccination is recommended for healthcare workers (HCWs), but coverage is often low. We reviewed studies evaluating interventions to increase seasonal influenza vaccination coverage in HCWs, including a meta-regression analysis to quantify the effect of each component. Fourty-six eligible studies were identified. Domains conferring a high risk of bias were identified in most studies. Mandatory vaccination was the most effective intervention component (Risk Ratio of being unvaccinated [RRunvacc] = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08–0.45), followed by “soft” mandates such as declination statements (RRunvacc = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45–0.92), increased awareness (RRunvacc = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71–0.97) and increased access (RRunvacc = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78–1.00). For incentives the difference was not significant, while for education no effect was observed. Heterogeneity was substantial (τ2 = 0.083). These results indicate that effective alternatives to mandatory HCWs influenza vaccination do exist, and need to be further explored in future studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lytras, T., Kopsachilis, F., Mouratidou, E., Papamichail, D., & Bonovas, S. (2016). Interventions to increase seasonal influenza vaccine coverage in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 12(3), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2015.1106656

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free