There has been a long struggle for reproductive health in the Philippines. In this chapter, I reflect on the process leading up to the passage of the Reproductive Health Bill in the Philippines in December 2012. Although there is much to be dissatisfied with in the implementation of the Bill, the process leading up to its passage in 2012 is instructive. This prompts reflection on the role of academics in promoting social change, the possibility of coalitions between academics and activists, and the importance of transnational solidarity, even in campaigns focused largely in a particular national context. Opposition to the Bill, on the part of the Catholic Church of the Philippines, also drew on international connections and communication between conservative lobby groups. Furthermore, policies on reproductive health and human rights issues have international repercussions where they weaken the efficacy of international agreements on such issues. On 13 December 2012, the House of Representatives (HOR) of the Republic of the Philippines passed, on second reading, House Bill 4244, 1 better known as the RH (Reproductive Health) Bill. The passage in the HOR on second reading gave 1 The full title is An Act Providing for a Comprehensive Policy on Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health, and Population and Development, and for Other Purposes. Hereinafter, 'Reproductive Health Bill' or 'RH Bill'. THE SoCIAL SCIEnCES In THE ASIAn CEnTuRy 98 President Benigno Simeon Aquino III the necessary political capital to certify the Bill as urgent. This paved the way for the Philippines Senate to set aside the mandated three-day waiting period between second and third readings of its own version, An Act Providing for a National Policy on Reproductive Health and Population and Development, and vote the Bill into law on 17 December 2012. On that same day, the HOR voted to pass the Reproductive Health Bill into law on third reading. President Aquino subsequently signed the consolidated version of both houses of the Philippine Congress on 21 December 2012 into law as the The Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 (hereinafter, the RH law). Subsequently, on 16 March 2013, the RH law's implementing rules and regulations were also signed, in a working-class community in Manila. The certification of the RH Bill as urgent was necessary because the last weeks of 2012 were also the last few weeks before the adjournment of the Fifteenth Congress. After 12 years,
CITATION STYLE
Estrada-Claudio, S. (2015). Voices and choices in reproductive rights: Scholarship and activism. In The Social Sciences in the Asian Century. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/ssac.09.2015.06
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.