The decision to commit crime: Rational or nonrational?

15Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Rational choice theory has received a fair amount of attention from criminal justice scholars and societal policy makers looking for an alternative to traditional deterministic theories of criminal behavior and is a core feature of several major criminological theories. In an effort to provide a more comprehensive perspective on criminal decision-making, the current paper highlights the role of emotion in the choice process and reviews factors that increase the likelihood of antisocial outcomes. The result is a theory of decision-making in which the individual is believed to act on the hedonistic and moral emotions that guide moral decision-making and where irrelevant emotions are enhanced and relevant emotions dampened by cognitive and situational factors that, in the end, serve as the foundation for criminal choice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walters, G. D. (2015). The decision to commit crime: Rational or nonrational? Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society, 16(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047x.10.2016.3.252-270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free