From philosophy of science to philosophy of literature (and back) via philosophy of mind: Philip Kitcher's philosophical pendulum

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A recent focus of Philip Kitcher's research has been, somewhat surprisingly in the light of his earlier work, the philosophical analyses of literary works and operas. Some may see a discontinuity in Kitcher's oeuvre in this respect-it may be difficult to see how his earlier contributions to philosophy of science relate to this much less mainstream approach to philosophy. The aim of this paper is to show that there is no such discontinuity: Kitcher's contributions to the philosophy of science and his more recent endeavors into the philosophy of literature and of music are grounded in the same big picture attitude towards the human mind-an attitude that he would undoubtedly call 'pragmatic': one that emphasizes the importance of those mental processes that are not (or not entirely) rational.

References Powered by Scopus

The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice

11445Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The empirical case for two systems of reasoning

2756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth

861Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Philosophy versus literature? against the discontinuity thesis

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Art of Writing in the Republic of Philosophy

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Philosophy, literature, and emotional engagement: A response to Nanay

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nanay, B. (2013). From philosophy of science to philosophy of literature (and back) via philosophy of mind: Philip Kitcher’s philosophical pendulum. Theoria (Spain), 28(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.6534

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

40%

Arts and Humanities 2

40%

Decision Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free