Exploring the Contributions of Combined Model Regional Medical Education Campuses to the Physician Workforce

2Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose Physician shortages and maldistribution, particularly within family medicine, have led many medical schools worldwide to create regional medical campuses (RMCs) for clerkship training. However, Canadian medical schools have developed a number of RMCs in which all years of training (i.e., a combined model that includes both preclerkship and clinical training) are provided geographically separate from the main campus. This study addresses the question: Are combined model RMC graduates more likely to enter postgraduate training in family medicine and rural-focused programs relative to main campus graduates? Method The authors used a quasi-experimental research design and analyzed 2006-2016 data from the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS). Graduating students (N = 26,525) from 16 Canadian medical schools who applied for the CaRMS match in their year of medical school graduation were eligible for inclusion. The proportions of graduates who matched to postgraduate training in (1) family medicine and (2) rural-focused programs were compared for combined model RMCs and main campuses. Results Of RMC graduates, 48.4% matched to family medicine (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46.1-50.7) compared with 37.1% of main campus graduates (95% CI = 36.5-37.7; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bates, J., Grandmaison, P., Banner, S. R., Lovato, C. Y., & Eva, K. W. (2021). Exploring the Contributions of Combined Model Regional Medical Education Campuses to the Physician Workforce. Academic Medicine, 96(3), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003560

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free