Are microsaccades responsible for the gap effect?

15Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Extinguishing a fixation point shortly before, or concurrently with, the onset of a peripheral visual target reduces the latency of saccades to that target. Saslow (1967) hypothesized that this gap effect might occur because fixation point offsets reduce the incidence of corrective microsaccades with an associated saccadic refractory period. In the present study, a robust gap effect was obtained. However, using a Purkinje image eyetracker with 1 arcmin of resolution, we found that fixation point offsets had no effect on the occurrence of microsaccades and that the occurrence of microsaccades had no impact on the magnitude of the gap effect. Microsaccades therefore do not appear to play any part in the production of the gap effect. © 1995 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kingstone, A., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Fendrich, R., & Wessinger, C. M. (1995). Are microsaccades responsible for the gap effect? Perception & Psychophysics, 57(6), 796–801. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206795

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free