Assessing the effects of a soft cut-off in the twitter social network

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most popular OSNs currently restrict the number of social links that a user can have, in order to deal with the problems of increasing spam and scalability in the face of a rapid rise in the number of users in recent years. However such restrictions are often being criticized by socially active and popular users, hence the OSN authorities are facing serious design-choices while imposing restrictions; this is evident from the innovative 'soft' cut-off recently imposed in Twitter instead of the traditional 'hard' cut-offs in other OSNs. Our goal in this paper is to develop an analytical framework taking the restriction in Twitter as a case-study, that can be used to make proper design-choices considering the conflicting objectives of reducing system-load and minimizing user-dissatisfaction. We consequently define a simple utility function considering the above two objectives, and find that Twitter's policy well balances both. From a network science perspective, this is the first analysis of 'soft' cut-offs in any sort of network, to the best of our knowledge. © 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

References Powered by Scopus

Emergence of scaling in random networks

29248Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Power-law distributions in empirical data

6714Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?

5155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evolution of superpeer topologies — An analytical perspective

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghosh, S., Srivastava, A., & Ganguly, N. (2011). Assessing the effects of a soft cut-off in the twitter social network. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6641 LNCS, pp. 288–300). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20798-3_22

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

57%

Physics and Astronomy 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Engineering 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free