Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale

10Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study assessed the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) in a sample of Korean adults. In a baseline study conducted in June 2015, the DRS- 15, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), and Korean Resilience Questionnaire-53 (KRQ-53) were administered to 409 Korean adults aged 20–79 years. A 1-year follow-up study was conducted in June 2016, and the CES-D was administered to assess predictive validity. Confirmatory factor analysis identified three dimensions for the DRS-15: commitment, control, and challenge (χ2/df = 2.32, GFI = .90, AGFI = .88, RMR = .04, TLI = .91, NFI = .89, and RMSEA = .05), and concurrent and predictive validity were demonstrated via the CES-D and KRQ-53. Furthermore, the DRS-15 established known-group validity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for internal consistency reliability of the three subscales ranged from .75 to.83. Three-week test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from .80 to.81. The KDRS-15 showed satisfactory construct and criterion validity and internal consistency.

References Powered by Scopus

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

7893Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of a new Resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC)

7307Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Determination and quantification of content validity

4271Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Factors influencing well-being in clinical nurses: A path analysis using a multi-mediation model

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emotional intelligence, burnout, and professional fulfillment in clinical year medical students

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relationship among symptoms, resilience, post-traumatic growth, and quality of life in patients with glioma

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ko, E., Kim, H. Y., Bartone, P. T., & Kang, H. S. (2018). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 23, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1417612

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

63%

Researcher 7

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 13

57%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

17%

Social Sciences 2

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0