Working for Europe? Managing Erasmus+ in the Austerity Era

  • Cairns D
  • Cuzzocrea V
  • Briggs D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Chapter 4 focuses on student mobility, using the example of the Erasmus undergraduate exchange platform to explain how this form of movement has come to be dominated by young people from well-off backgrounds, who tend to possess high levels of social and economic capital as well as being pre-attuned to the values associated with the European institutions. For this reason, Erasmus inevitably fails to spread employability or advance inter-cultural understanding and Europeanisation objectives since movers are already in possession of these attributes. For education professionals working for Erasmus in national contexts subject to austerity, long-standing challenges in mobility governance relating to bureaucratic and resource issues, and inequalities in the regional distribution of resources for the programme, are heightened by economic pressures on economic crisis-hit families. This situation greatly reduces the number of student candidates for outward mobility, explaining the growing disparities in levels of circulation between different European countries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cairns, D., Cuzzocrea, V., Briggs, D., & Veloso, L. (2017). Working for Europe? Managing Erasmus+ in the Austerity Era. In The Consequences of Mobility (pp. 67–92). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46741-2_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free