Security of 2t-root identification and signatures

16Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ong-Schnorr identification and signatures are variants of the Fiat-Shamir scheme with short and fast communication and signatures. This scheme uses secret keys that are 2t-roots modulo N of the public keys, whereas Fiat-Shamir uses square roots modulo N. Security for particular cases has recently been proved by Micali [M94] and Shoup [Sh96]. We prove that identification and signatures are secure for arbitrary moduli N = pq unless N can easily be factored. The proven security of identification against active impersonation attacks depends on the maximal 2-power 2m that divides either p − 1 or q − 1. We show that signatures are secure against adaptive chosen-message attacks. This proves the security of a very efficient signature scheme.

References Powered by Scopus

How to prove yourself: Practical solutions to identification and signature problems

2555Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems

2087Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficient signature generation by smart cards

2031Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Optimistic fair exchange of digital signatures

338Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Security proofs for identity-based identification and signature schemes

251Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GQ and schnorr identification schemes: Proofs of security against impersonation under active and concurrent attacks

216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schnorr, C. P. (1996). Security of 2t-root identification and signatures. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1109, pp. 143–156). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68697-5_12

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

14%

Researcher 5

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 27

75%

Mathematics 4

11%

Engineering 3

8%

Physics and Astronomy 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free