Gathering speed and countering tensions in the rapid learning health system

14Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The vision of the learning health system (LHS), conceptualized 15 years ago, is for the rapid generation, use, and spread of high-quality evidence that yields better health experiences, outcomes, efficiencies, and equity in everyday practice settings across communities. However, despite the emergence of many useful LHS frameworks and examples to guide adoption, large gaps remain in the speed and consistency with which evidence is generated and used across the range of settings from the bedside to the policy table. Gaps in progress are not surprising, however, given the tensions that predictably arise when key stakeholders—researchers, health systems, and funders—comingle in these efforts. This commentary examines eight core tensions that naturally arise and offers practical actions that stakeholders can take to address these tensions and speed LHS adoption. The urgency for attenuating these tensions and accelerating health system improvements has never been higher. Timeliness, rigor, and prioritization can be aligned across stakeholders, but only if all partners are intentional about the operational and cultural challenges that exist.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reid, R. J., & Greene, S. M. (2023, July 1). Gathering speed and countering tensions in the rapid learning health system. Learning Health Systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10358

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free