Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Five Different Tests in Diagnosing Visceral Leishmaniasis in an Endemic Region of Ethiopia

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The lack of accurate and feasible diagnostic tests poses a significant challenge to visceral leishmaniasis (VL) healthcare services in endemic areas. To date, various VL diagnostic tests have been or are being developed, and their diagnostic performances need to be assessed. In the present study, the diagnostic performances of rk39 RDT, the direct agglutination test (DAT), microscopy, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and miniature direct-on-blood polymerase chain reaction–nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay (mini-dbPCR-NALFIA) were assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) as the reference test in an endemic region of Ethiopia. In this study, 235 suspected VL cases and 104 non-endemic healthy controls (NEHCs) were recruited. Among the suspected VL cases, 144 (61.28%) tested positive with qPCR. The sensitivities for rk39 RDT, DAT, microscopy, LAMP assay, and mini-dbPCR-NALFIA were 88.11%, 96.50%, 76.58%, 94.33%, and 95.80%, respectively. The specificities were 83.33%, 97.96%, 100%, 97.38%, and 98.92% for rk39 RDT, DAT, microscopy, LAMP assay, and mini-dbPCR-NALFIA, respectively. In conclusion, rk39 RDT and microscopy exhibited lower sensitivities, while DAT demonstrated excellent performance. LAMP and mini-dbPCR-NALFIA showed excellent performances with feasibility for implementation in remote endemic areas, although the latter requires further evaluation in such regions.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hagos, D. G., Kiros, Y. K., Abdulkader, M., Schallig, H. D. F. H., & Wolday, D. (2024). Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Five Different Tests in Diagnosing Visceral Leishmaniasis in an Endemic Region of Ethiopia. Diagnostics, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020163

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

67%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

17%

Immunology and Microbiology 1

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free