Epoetin delta in the management of renal anaemia: Results of a 6-month study

20Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. Epoetin delta is an epoetin that, unlike existing agents, is produced in a human cell line. The present study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous (i.v.) epoetin delta compared with i.v. epoetin alfa. Methods. This was a 6-month, multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial in haemodialysis patients previously receiving epoetin alfa. Haematological parameters were assessed, and adverse events monitored. Equivalent efficacy was defined as a difference in mean haemoglobin between the two agents over weeks 12-24 of ≤ 1 g/dl with a 90% confidence interval (CI) within the range -1 to 1 g/dl. Results. In total, 560 patients received epoetin delta while 192 received epoetin alfa, and 76.8% and 79.7% of patients, respectively, completed the study. Both agents showed similar efficacy in controlling anaemia: the point estimate for the difference in mean haemoglobin over weeks 12-24 was 0.01 g/dl (90% CI, -0.13, 0.15 g/dl), confirming equivalence. Adverse events were those expected in dialysis patients. Events possibly related to treatment occurred in 9.2% of patients receiving epoetin delta and 8.4% receiving epoetin alfa. Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 33.0% and 26.7% of patients in the epoetin delta and epoetin alfa groups, respectively. Six patients in the epoetin delta group experienced an SAE considered possibly related to treatment (mostly access-related clotting), compared with no patient in the epoetin delta group. None of these SAEs were life threatening. Conclusions. Epoetin delta was shown to have an equivalent efficacy and safety profile to epoetin alfa in this 6-month study. © The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, K. J. (2007). Epoetin delta in the management of renal anaemia: Results of a 6-month study. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 22(10), 3052–3054. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfm490

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free