Texture segmentation: An objective comparison between five traditional algorithms and a deep-learning U-net architecture

22Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper compares a series of traditional and deep learning methodologies for the segmentation of textures. Six well-known texture composites first published by Randen and Husøy were used to compare traditional segmentation techniques (co-occurrence, filtering, local binary patterns, watershed, multiresolution sub-band filtering) against a deep-learning approach based on the U-Net architecture. For the latter, the effects of depth of the network, number of epochs and different optimisation algorithms were investigated. Overall, the best results were provided by the deep-learning approach. However, the best results were distributed within the parameters, and many configurations provided results well below the traditional techniques.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karabağ, C., Verhoeven, J., RachelMiller, N., & Reyes-Aldasoro, C. C. (2019). Texture segmentation: An objective comparison between five traditional algorithms and a deep-learning U-net architecture. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183900

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free