Poleward expansion of the hadley circulation in CMIP5 simulations

124Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Observational analyses have demonstrated that the Hadley circulation has expanded poleward in recent decades. Important issues are what caused the widening of the Hadley circulation and whether the observed widening is related to anthropogenic forcing. In the present study, we use currently available simulations of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase-5 (CMIP5) to analyze changes in the width of the Hadley circulation. It is found that CMIP5 historical simulations with greenhouse gas (GHG) forcing generate a total widening of ~0. 15°±0. 06° in latitude (10 yr)-1 for the period 1979-2005, and the widening in CMIP5 historical simulations with all forcings is ~0. 17° ± 0. 06° per decade. Similar to that in CMIP3, the simulated poleward expansion in CMIP5 is much weaker than the observational reanalyses. In CMIP5 projection simulations for the 21st century, magnitudes of widening of the Hadley circulation increase with radiative forcing. For the extreme projected radiative forcing of RCP8. 5, the total annual-mean widening of the Hadley circulation is ~0. 27° ± 0. 04° (10 yr)-1 in the 21st century. Although CMIP5 underestimates observed poleward expansion of the Hadley circulation, the results of this study suggest that the observed trends in the width of the Hadley circulation are caused by anthropogenic forcing and that increasing GHGs play an important role in the observed poleward expansion of the Hadley circulation, in addition to other forcings emphasized in previous studies. © 2013 Chinese National Committee for International Association of Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Science Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, Y., Tao, L., & Liu, J. (2013). Poleward expansion of the hadley circulation in CMIP5 simulations. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 30(3), 790–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2187-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free