Polychaete nervous systems: Ground pattern and variations - cLS microscopy and the importance of novel characteristics in phylogenetic analysis

67Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In Annelida, as well as in other invertebrate taxa, the nervous system is considered to be a very conservative organ system. Immunohistochemical investigations [use of anti-5-HT (serotonin), FMRFamide, and acetylated α-tubulin antibodies] in combination with laser scanning microscopy enable more detailed reanalyses of known structures and detection of new characteristics that are useful for phylogenetic analyses. One hypothesis enabled by such studies is outlined for the evolution of arrangements of the dorsal circumesophageal roots in polychaetes and oligochaetes. These roots are not a unique feature of polychaetes; they also occur in oligochaetes. According to the Articulata hypothesis of metazoan relationships, the specific structure of the rope-ladder-like nervous system is, among others, an autapomorphic characteristic that unifies Annelida and Arthropoda. Recent studies applying the techniques mentioned here, however, demonstrate that the annelidan bauchmark (central nervous system of the trunk), in contrast to the arthropod pattern, is highly variable in terms of the number and position of connectives and the number of commissures per segment. The variability of the neuronal architecture as well as a hypothesis on how it evolved will be introduced with the aid of regeneration and developmental studies. Furthermore, it is shown that hitherto unknown nerves are present in the peripheral nervous system. © The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology 2006. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Müller, M. C. M. (2006). Polychaete nervous systems: Ground pattern and variations - cLS microscopy and the importance of novel characteristics in phylogenetic analysis. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 46(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icj017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free