On social media science seems to be more human: Exploring researchers as digital science communicators

10Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In contemporary media discourses, researchers may be perceived to communicate something they do not intend to, such as coldness or irrelevance. However, researchers are facing new responsibilities concerning how popular formats used to present science will impact science’s cultural authority (Bucchi, 2017). Currently, there is limited research on the microlevel practices of digital science communication involving researchers as actors. Therefore, this qualitative study explores how digital academic discourse practices develop, using the tweeting and blogging of researchers involved in a multidisciplinary renewable energy research project as a case. The results of a thematic analysis of interviews with researchers (n = 17) suggests that the researchers’ perceptions form a scale ranging from traditional to progressively adjusted practices, which are labelled ‘informing,’ ‘anchoring,’ ‘luring,’ and ‘maneuvering.’ These imply an attempt to diminish the gap between science and the public. The interviewees acknowledge that scientific facts may not be interesting and that they need captivating means that are common in the use of new media, such as buzzwords and clickbait. It appears that trials and experimentation with hybrid genres helped the researchers to distinguish the contours of digital academic discourses. The implications support suggestions to broaden the trajectories of expertise and communication, including issues of culture and identity, trust, and the relevance of science. It is argued that scientists’ embrace of new media channels will refine some articulations of the mediatization processes, and these findings support recent suggestions that mediatization could also be conceptualized as a strategic resource.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

110426Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era

942Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding social media logic

903Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Digital mis/disinformation and public engagment with health and science controversies: Fresh perspectives from Covid-19

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What Makes Tweetorials Tick: How Experts Communicate Complex Topics on Twitter

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dimensions of trust in different forms of science communication: the role of information sources and channels used to acquire science knowledge

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koivumäki, K., Koivumäki, T., & Karvonen, E. (2020). On social media science seems to be more human: Exploring researchers as digital science communicators. Media and Communication, 8(2), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2812

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

62%

Researcher 5

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 8

42%

Arts and Humanities 6

32%

Psychology 4

21%

Decision Sciences 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free