Why some students continue to value individual, face-to- face research consultations in a technology-rich world

54Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For decades, academic librarians have provided individual research consultations for students. There is little information, however, about why students schedule consultations, the kinds of assistance students feel are provided by librarians during consultations, and what students find valuable about face-to-face consultations, even with the availability of online research help. This exploratory, qualitative study of individual research consultations at the University of Vermont gathered students' views on these questions. The findings will help librarians better understand how individual consultations serve students and what role consultations should play in the mix of reference services offered. © 2013 Trina J. Magi and Patricia E. Mardeusz.

References Powered by Scopus

Undergraduate perceptions of information literacy: Defining, attaining, and self-assessing skills

121Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Library is Dead, Long Live the Library! The Practice of Academic Librarianship and the Digital Revolution

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is traditional reference service obsolete?

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A framework for planning academic library spaces

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is the need for mediated reference service in academic libraries fading away in the digital environment?

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Librarian, Faculty, and Student Perceptions of Academic Librarians: Study Introduction and Literature Review

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magi, T. J., & Mardeusz, P. E. (2013). Why some students continue to value individual, face-to- face research consultations in a technology-rich world. College and Research Libraries, 74(6), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl12-363

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Researcher 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 37

64%

Arts and Humanities 9

16%

Computer Science 6

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free