Improving the patient-centred care of children with life-altering skin conditions using feedback from electronic patient-reported outcome measures: Protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study (PEDS-ePROM)

7Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with children have been described as ‘giving a voice to the child’. Few studies have examined the routine use of these measures as potentially therapeutic interventions. This study aims to investigate: (1) theeffectivenessof feedback using graphical displays of information from electronic PROMs (ePROMs) that target health-related quality of life, to improve health outcomes, referrals and treatment satisfaction and (2) theimplementationof ePROMs and graphical displays by assessing acceptability, sustainability, cost, fidelity and context of the intervention and study processes. A hybrid II effectiveness-implementation study will be conducted from February 2020 with children with life-altering skin conditions attending two outpatient clinics at a specialist paediatric children’s hospital. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial and mixed methods process evaluation will be completed. Randomisation will occur at the child participant level. Children or parent proxies completing baseline ePROMs will be randomised to: (1) completion of ePROMs plus graphical displays of ePROM results to treating clinicians in consultations, versus (2) completion of ePROMs without graphical display of ePROM results. The primary outcome of the effectiveness trial will be overall health-related quality of life of children. Secondary outcomes will include other health-related quality of life outcomes (eg, child psychosocial and physical health, parent psychosocial health), referrals and treatment satisfaction. Trial data will be primarily analysed using linear mixed-effects models; and implementation data using inductive thematic analysis of interviews, meeting minutes, observational field notes and study communication mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Ethical approval was obtained from Children’s Health Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2019/QCHQ/56290), The University of Queensland (2019002233) and Queensland University of Technology (1900000847). Dissemination will occur through stakeholder groups, scientific meetings and peer-reviewed publications. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000174987).

References Powered by Scopus

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

8783Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

6472Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

6191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Optimising symptom management in children with cancer using a novel mobile phone application: protocol for a controlled hybrid effectiveness implementation trial (RESPONSE)

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Barriers and facilitators of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) for patients in home palliative cancer care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ perceptions

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Burn Scar Rehabilitation: A Guide to Implementation and Evaluation

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tyack, Z., Simons, M., McPhail, S. M., Harvey, G., Zappala, T., Ware, R. S., & Kimble, R. M. (2021). Improving the patient-centred care of children with life-altering skin conditions using feedback from electronic patient-reported outcome measures: Protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study (PEDS-ePROM). BMJ Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041861

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

58%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

19%

Researcher 6

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

41%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

28%

Social Sciences 5

17%

Psychology 4

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free