We develop a decision tree based game-theoretical approach for constructing functional responses in multi-prey/multipatch environments and for finding the corresponding optimal foraging strategies. Decision trees provide a way to describe details of predator foraging behavior, based on the predator's sequence of choices at different decision points, that facilitates writing down the corresponding functional response. It is shown that the optimal foraging behavior that maximizes predator energy intake per unit time is a Nash equilibrium of the underlying optimal foraging game. We apply these game-theoretical methods to three scenarios: the classical diet choice model with two types of prey and sequential prey encounters, the diet choice model with simultaneous prey encounters, and a model in which the predator requires a positive recognition time to identify the type of prey encountered. For both diet choice models, it is shown that every Nash equilibrium yields optimal foraging behavior. Although suboptimal Nash equilibrium outcomes may exist when prey recognition time is included, only optimal foraging behavior is stable under evolutionary learning processes. © 2014 Cressman et al.
CITATION STYLE
Cressman, R., Křivan, V., Brown, J. S., & Garay, J. (2014). Game-theoretic methods for functional response and optimal foraging behavior. PLoS ONE, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088773
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.