A defence of the category 'women'

78Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Against influential strands of feminist theory, I argue that there is nothing essentialist or homogenising about the category 'women'. I show that both intersectional claims that it is impossible to separate out the 'woman part' of women, and deconstructionist contentions that the category 'women' is a fiction, rest on untenable meta-theoretical assumptions. I posit that a more fruitful way of approaching this disputed category is to treat it as an abstraction. Drawing on the philosophical framework of critical realism I elucidate the nature of the vital and inevitable process of abstraction, as a means of finding a way out of the theoretical and methodological impasse that the 'ban' on the category 'women' has caused. Contrary to many contemporary feminist theorists, I contend that, although the category 'women' does not reflect the whole reality of concrete and particular women, it nevertheless refers to something real, namely the structural position as woman. © The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gunnarsson, L. (2011). A defence of the category “women.” Feminist Theory, 12(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700110390604

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free