An interactive meta-analysis of MRI biomarkers of Myelin

94Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Several MRI measures have been proposed as in vivo biomarkers of myelin, each with applications ranging from plasticity to pathology. Despite the availability of these myelin-sensitive modalities, specificity and sensitivity have been a matter of discussion. Debate about which MRI measure is the most suitable for quantifying myelin is still ongoing. In this study, we performed a systematic review of published quantitative validation studies to clarify how different these measures are when compared to the underlying histology. We analyzed the results from 43 studies applying meta-analysis tools, controlling for study sample size and using interactive visualization (https://neurolibre.github.io/myelin-meta-analysis). We report the overall estimates and the prediction intervals for the coefficient of determination and find that MT and relaxometry-based measures exhibit the highest correlations with myelin content. We also show which measures are, and which measures are not statistically different regarding their relationship with histology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mancini, M., Karakuzu, A., Cohen-Adad, J., Cercignani, M., Nichols, T. E., & Stikov, N. (2020). An interactive meta-analysis of MRI biomarkers of Myelin. ELife, 9, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61523

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free